Section 336, also known as theSpecial Rule for Model Aircraft, is under attack. This is quite worrying for American model flyers as it means a lot of the freedom enjoyed by recreational RC enthusiasts could be lost if an amendment is accepted.
About Section 336
At the moment, the 'Special Rule' exempts model aircraft activity from FAA regulation. Essentially what this means is that, as long as you abide by the Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA) guidelines, you can fly your plane or quad. When it comes to registering a model airplane, under the special rule you must register with the FAA as a 'modeller' and label your model aircraft with your personal registration number. Simple!
What the changes might mean
Eliminating the Special Rule for Model Aircraft would be a real step backwards for the RC hobby. It would make getting involved far more difficult for new pilots. It would also put limits on flying locations. Although in well intended, it is highly problematic.
- Flying toys would be subjected to FAA regulation
- Would require permission to fly in any airspace, including a backyard. To get permission may take months depending on response times from the FAA
- Any pilots would have to pass an online aeronautical test (problematic for getting friends into the hobby through passing the transmitter)
- Kids under 13 might not be able to fly
Austin Furey sums up his thoughts on the proposed changes.
'Many hobbyists that still enjoy flexibility regarding when, where and how they fly do so without fully understanding the mechanism that protects their ability to do so. There are companies and lobbyists that have a lot to gain by modifying or eliminating the Special Rule for Model Aircraft and hobbyists have everything to lose if those efforts succeed.'
What we can do
If you're based in the US, you can write to the elected representatives in Congress. Here's a useful link to the AMA website with a super easy template letter you can sign and send straight away.
Links to more information
About the Special Rule for Model Aircraft
Article by James Whomsley
Editor of FliteTest.com
Log In to reply
AMA seems to be pro this Sanford/Davis amendment:
https://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/SANFOR_075_xml42418180148148.pdf
And against this DeFazio one:
https://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/DEFAZI_099_xmlv5419181229352935.pdf
It reads to me that the Sanford one says that the FAA can't make new rules, except for anything that is FPV related. Sec 3a says no new rules except for BVLOS capable systems if you are a hobbyist or part of the AMA. Am I getting that right? I read the old rules, and it was pretty hard to keep that straight too.
The full list is here:
https://rules.house.gov/bill/115/hr-4
Log In to reply
Just started this hobby last September, would hate to see it get strangled by unnecessary government involvement!
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
The FAA was created about 1953 for the purpose of ". . promoting safety and efficiency in INTERSTATE AIR COMMERCE." That is Constitutional. Flying RC aircraft is not interstate commerce. The feds have NO AUTHORITY here.
Suggest that you contact your STATE elected representation, educate them and then eject the federal bureaucrats from your state.
Log In to reply
Log In to reply
Log In to reply